📄 propositions run43
Propositions Run43 — 2026-04-15 — Propositions — 2026-04-15
EU Parliament analysis — 2026-04-15 发布日期 2026-04-15 · 分析运行 56d5a875-0b05-4753-8aca-36b9af05c1e2, 附来源链接的投票、委员会、立法程序、政治联盟和政策影响情报 背景: European Parliament Q1 2026 legislative…
读者情报指南
使用本指南将文章作为政治情报产品而非原始工件集合来阅读。高价值读者视角优先呈现;技术出处可在审计附录中查阅。
Actors & Forces
Significance Scoring
Scoring Context
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Scoring ID | SIG-2026-04-15-RUN43 |
| Analysis Date | 2026-04-15 (T-0 Tariff Activation) |
| Items Scored | 51 adopted texts + 51 procedures |
| Period Focus | Q1 2026 Legislative Surge → Q2 Implementation |
| Confidence | 🟢 HIGH |
Scored Items
| Rank | Item | Reference | Score | Urgency | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US Tariff Countermeasures (T-0) | TA-10-2026-0096 | 8.8 | CRITICAL | 🟢 HIGH |
| 2 | Banking Union SRMR3 | TA-10-2026-0092 | 7.8 | HIGH | 🟢 HIGH |
| 3 | Anti-Corruption Directive | TA-10-2026-0094 | 7.2 | HIGH | 🟢 HIGH |
| 4 | New COD Pipeline (13 procedures) | 2026/0008-0085(COD) | 6.8 | MEDIUM | 🟡 MEDIUM |
| 5 | EU-Mercosur Safeguard Clause | TA-10-2026-0030 | 6.4 | MEDIUM | 🟢 HIGH |
| 6 | Copyright & Generative AI | TA-10-2026-0066 | 6.0 | MEDIUM | 🟡 MEDIUM |
| 7 | Housing Crisis Resolution | TA-10-2026-0064 | 5.8 | LOW | 🟢 HIGH |
| 8 | EU Talent Pool | TA-10-2026-0058 | 5.6 | LOW | 🟢 HIGH |
| 9 | Electoral Act Reform | TA-10-2026-0006 | 5.4 | LOW | 🟡 MEDIUM |
| 10 | Defence Market Barriers | TA-10-2026-0079 | 5.2 | LOW | 🟡 MEDIUM |
Scoring Rationale
1. US Tariff Countermeasures — 8.8/10
- Timeliness: T-0 activation day (April 15, 2026) — maximum urgency
- Impact breadth: Affects EU-US trade (€700B+ annually), auto sector (DE), agriculture (FR), tech imports
- Political significance: Rare cross-party consensus (EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR, Greens all supported)
- Implementation chain: Commission now manages escalation ladder with Council; EP oversight via INTA
- Precedent: First use of rapid-response tariff mechanism under post-pandemic trade framework
2. Banking Union SRMR3 — 7.8/10
- Structural reform: Completes the Banking Union architecture initiated in 2014
- Coalition significance: Grand coalition + Greens delivered; ECR Nordic dissent on deposit insurance
- Implementation: 24-month transposition timeline means real-world impact by Q1 2028
- Institutional: Strengthens SRB powers; new bail-in tools for mid-size banks
3. Anti-Corruption Directive — 7.2/10
- Democratic standards: First EU-wide anti-corruption legislative standard
- Political dynamics: PfE opposition to asset declarations reveals democratic values fault line
- Trilogue ahead: EP position adopted; Council negotiations will test member state compliance appetite
- Enlargement link: Strengthens EU credibility on rule-of-law conditionality
4. New COD Pipeline — 6.8/10
- Volume: 13 new COD procedures filed in Q1 2026 — above EP10 trajectory
- Committee capacity: Absorption capacity untested for this volume
- Policy breadth: Spans digital, trade, environment, social policy
- Implementation risk: Backlog risk if committees cannot process simultaneously
Risk Assessment
Risk Matrix
Risk Dashboard
| Category | Level | Trend | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geopolitical | 🔴 CRITICAL | ↑ | US tariff T-0 activation |
| Policy Implementation | 🟠 HIGH | → | Banking Union 24-month transposition |
| Institutional | 🟡 MEDIUM | → | Anti-corruption trilogue timeline |
| Coalition Stability | 🟡 MEDIUM | ↘ | Grand coalition 38-seat deficit |
| Legislative Throughput | 🟡 MEDIUM | ↑ | 13 new COD procedures backlog |
| Democratic Standards | 🟢 LOW | → | Electoral Act implementation |
Risk Matrix Visualization
%%{init: {
"theme": "dark",
"themeVariables": {
"quadrant1Fill": "#1565C0",
"quadrant2Fill": "#2E7D32",
"quadrant3Fill": "#FF9800",
"quadrant4Fill": "#D32F2F",
"quadrantTitleFill": "#ffffff",
"quadrantPointFill": "#ffffff",
"quadrantPointTextFill": "#ffffff",
"quadrantXAxisTextFill": "#ffffff",
"quadrantYAxisTextFill": "#ffffff"
},
"quadrantChart": {
"chartWidth": 700,
"chartHeight": 700,
"pointLabelFontSize": 14,
"titleFontSize": 22,
"quadrantLabelFontSize": 18,
"xAxisLabelFontSize": 16,
"yAxisLabelFontSize": 16
}
}}%%
quadrantChart
title Legislative Risk Assessment Q1 2026
x-axis "Low Likelihood" --> "High Likelihood"
y-axis "Low Impact" --> "High Impact"
quadrant-1 "Critical Risk Zone"
quadrant-2 "Monitor Closely"
quadrant-3 "Accept & Monitor"
quadrant-4 "Active Management"
"Tariff Escalation": [0.55, 0.92]
"Banking Dilution": [0.30, 0.78]
"Anticorruption Stall": [0.50, 0.72]
"COD Backlog": [0.70, 0.50]
"Coalition Fragmentation": [0.35, 0.55]
"Electoral Reform Delay": [0.40, 0.35]
Detailed Risk Assessments
R1: Trade War Escalation (CRITICAL)
- Likelihood: MEDIUM (0.55) — US-EU negotiations ongoing but positions hardening
- Impact: CRITICAL (0.92) — €700B+ trade relationship, auto/agri sectors, consumer prices
- Velocity: FAST — tariffs activate today (April 15), retaliation cycles measured in weeks
- Mitigation: Parliament adopted TA-10-2026-0096 + Mercosur safeguard TA-10-2026-0030; Commission managing escalation ladder
- Confidence: 🟢 HIGH
R2: Banking Union Council Dilution (HIGH)
- Likelihood: LOW (0.30) — Council has political commitment but technical objections from DE savings banks
- Impact: HIGH (0.78) — Would undermine Banking Union completion, EDIS progress, financial stability architecture
- Velocity: SLOW — 24-month transposition provides negotiation runway
- Mitigation: Strong EP mandate via grand coalition adoption; ECB institutional support
- Confidence: 🟡 MEDIUM
R3: Anti-Corruption Trilogue Stalling (HIGH)
- Likelihood: MEDIUM (0.50) — Several member states have implementation concerns
- Impact: HIGH (0.72) — EU democratic credibility, enlargement conditionality, rule-of-law tools
- Velocity: MEDIUM — Trilogue typically 6-12 months
- Mitigation: Strong EP position; Commission original proposal ambitious
- Confidence: 🟡 MEDIUM
R4: Legislative Backlog (MEDIUM)
- Likelihood: HIGH (0.70) — 13 new COD procedures in Q1 + carry-over from EP9
- Impact: MEDIUM (0.50) — Delay rather than failure; committee scheduling is bottleneck
- Velocity: SLOW — Accumulates over months
- Mitigation: Conference of Presidents can prioritise; parallel processing in committees
- Confidence: 🟢 HIGH
Forward Scenarios
| Scenario | Probability | Description | Key Trigger |
|---|---|---|---|
| A: Managed Transition | Likely | March adoptions proceed to implementation; new CODs processed at normal pace; tariff tensions managed | US-EU negotiation channel active |
| B: Escalation Overload | Possible | Tariff retaliation absorbs INTA/ECON bandwidth; legislative backlog grows; inter-institutional tension | US retaliatory tariffs on EU agriculture |
| C: Coalition Fracture | Unlikely | ECR breaks with EPP on trade response; grand coalition fails on key COD vote; legislative paralysis | PfE blocks key anti-corruption provision |
Threat Landscape
Political Threat Landscape
Threat Level: ELEVATED
Key drivers: tariff T-0 activation, inter-session gap, grand coalition deficit (-38 seats).
Threat-Procedure Mapping
| Threat | Procedures | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| US tariff escalation | TA-10-2026-0096 | CRITICAL |
| Banking lobby dilution | SRMR3 TA-10-2026-0092 | HIGH |
| Anti-corruption resistance | TA-10-2026-0094 | HIGH |
| Committee overload | 13 new COD | MEDIUM |
Trade Escalation Kill Chain
- US tariffs announced
- EP adopts countermeasures (Mar 26)
- T-0 activation (Apr 15 - TODAY)
- US response window (2-4 weeks) 5a. De-escalation OR 5b. Agricultural retaliation
Current: Stage 3. Confidence: HIGH.
Democratic Threat Indicators
- PfE opposes anti-corruption asset declarations: MEDIUM
- Electoral Act reform stalling: LOW persistent
- Committee referral data opacity: MEDIUM institutional
- Grand coalition deficit requiring ECR: MEDIUM stability
Deep Analysis
Executive Summary
European Parliament Q1 2026 legislative output surged 46% year-on-year to a projected 114 adopted acts. The March 26 plenary burst delivered Banking Union SRMR3, Anti-Corruption Directive, and tariff countermeasures. Today (April 15) marks T-0 for tariff activation. The pipeline transitions from adoption to implementation while 13 new COD procedures await committee referral.
Political Group Position Matrix
| Group | Tariff | Banking | Anti-Corruption | New COD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPP (185) | Support | Support | Support | TBD |
| S&D (135) | Support | Support | Support | TBD |
| Renew (76) | Support | Support | Support | TBD |
| ECR (79) | Support | Partial | Support | TBD |
| Greens (53) | Support | Support | Support | TBD |
| PfE (84) | Partial | Partial | Oppose | TBD |
| GUE/NGL (46) | Oppose | Oppose | Support | TBD |
| ESN (28) | Oppose | Oppose | Oppose | TBD |
Key Dossier Passage Probability
| Dossier | Stage | Probability | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tariff countermeasures | Activated T-0 | Complete | Today |
| Banking Union SRMR3 | Council phase | Likely 75% | Q4 2026 |
| Anti-Corruption | Trilogue | Possible 55% | Q2 2027 |
| New COD batch | Committee | Likely 80% | Q3-Q4 2026 |
Coalition Dynamics
Pattern A: Grand Coalition + Greens (Trade and Anti-Corruption)
Composition: EPP + S&D + Renew + Greens/EFA (449 seats, 62.4%) Applied to: Tariff countermeasures, Anti-Corruption, Mercosur safeguards
Pattern B: EPP + ECR + Partial PfE (Defence and Security)
Composition: EPP + ECR + partial PfE (280-320 seats) Applied to: Defence market barriers, Drones/warfare
ECR Fracture Pattern
Nordic delegations dissented on Banking Union deposit insurance (moral hazard). ECR supports tariff countermeasures (manufacturing constituency pressure). Selective engagement continues from prior sessions.
Implementation Timeline
| Adoption | Dossier | Next Step | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26 | SRMR3 | Council negotiation | Q2-Q3 2026 |
| Mar 26 | Anti-Corruption | Trilogue launch | Q2 2026 |
| Mar 26 | Tariff Response | T-0 TODAY | Immediate |
| Mar 10 | EU Talent Pool | National transposition | 2027 |
| Jan 21 | Air Passenger Rights | Implementation | 2026-2027 |
Supplementary Intelligence
Synthesis Summary
Intelligence Dashboard
Decision: PUBLISH as propositions article. Lead with pipeline transition from adoption to implementation on T-0 tariff day. Differentiated from breaking (T-0 news) and committee-reports (committee output) angles.
Top Findings by Significance
| Rank | Item | Score | Urgency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tariff T-0 Pipeline Impact | 8.8 | CRITICAL |
| 2 | Banking Union SRMR3 Post-Adoption | 7.8 | HIGH |
| 3 | Anti-Corruption Trilogue Path | 7.2 | HIGH |
| 4 | New COD Pipeline (13 procedures) | 6.8 | MEDIUM |
| 5 | EU-Mercosur Safeguard | 6.4 | MEDIUM |
Thematic Clusters
- Trade and Competitiveness: TA-10-2026-0096, TA-10-2026-0030, TA-10-2026-0086, TA-10-2026-0078
- Financial Governance: SRMR3, ECB appointments, European Semester, EGF mobilisations
- Democratic Standards: Anti-corruption, Electoral Act, Public access, Immunity waivers
- External Relations: CFSP report, Defence market, Drones, Enlargement, Magnitsky Act
- Digital and Technology: Copyright/AI, Tech sovereignty, Air passenger rights
- Social Policy: Housing, Workers rights, EU Talent Pool
Coalition Patterns
Two distinct patterns from March 26: Grand Coalition + Greens on trade/anti-corruption; EPP + ECR + partial PfE on defence/security.
Risk Summary
- Geopolitical: CRITICAL (tariff T-0)
- Policy Implementation: HIGH (Banking Union Council)
- Institutional: MEDIUM (anti-corruption trilogue)
- Coalition Stability: MEDIUM (grand coalition deficit)
- Legislative Throughput: MEDIUM (13 new COD)
Outlook
Scenario A (Likely): Managed transition - adoptions proceed to implementation, CODs processed normally Scenario B (Possible): Escalation overload - tariff retaliation absorbs INTA/ECON bandwidth Scenario C (Unlikely): Coalition fracture on trade response
Provenance & Audit
- Article type:
propositions-run43- Run date: 2026-04-15
- Run id:
56d5a875-0b05-4753-8aca-36b9af05c1e2- Gate result:
PENDING- Analysis tree: analysis/daily/2026-04-15/propositions-run43
- Manifest: manifest.json
情报技术参考
本文基于 Hack23 AB 情报技术库制作。本次运行中应用的所有方法论和工件模板均链接如下。
工件模板
- 分析模板库索引 分析模板库索引 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 参与者映射 参与者映射 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 参与者威胁画像 参与者威胁画像 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 分析索引(运行工件导航器) 分析索引(运行工件导航器) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 联盟动态 联盟动态 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 联盟数学 联盟数学 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Commission Wp Alignment Commission Wp Alignment — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 比较国际分析 比较国际分析 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 后果树 后果树 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 交叉引用地图 交叉引用地图 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 跨运行差异(贝叶斯增量) 跨运行差异(贝叶斯增量) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 跨会议情报 跨会议情报 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 数据下载清单 数据下载清单 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 深度政治分析(长篇) 深度政治分析(长篇) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 魔鬼代言人分析 魔鬼代言人分析 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 经济背景(世界银行与 IMF) 经济背景(世界银行与 IMF) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 高管简报 高管简报 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 力场分析(勒温力场) 力场分析(勒温力场) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 前瞻指标 前瞻指标 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Forward Projection Forward Projection — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 历史基线 历史基线 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 历史类比 历史类比 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Imf Vintage Audit Imf Vintage Audit — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 影响矩阵(事件×利益相关方) 影响矩阵(事件×利益相关方) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 实施可行性 实施可行性 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 情报评估 情报评估 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 立法干扰 立法干扰 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Legislative Pipeline Forecast Legislative Pipeline Forecast — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 立法速度风险 立法速度风险 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Mandate Fulfilment Scorecard Mandate Fulfilment Scorecard — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- MCP 可靠性审计 MCP 可靠性审计 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 媒体框架分析 媒体框架分析 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 方法论反思(回顾) 方法论反思(回顾) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Parliamentary Calendar Projection Parliamentary Calendar Projection — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 按文件政治情报 按文件政治情报 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- PESTLE 分析(六维扫描) PESTLE 分析(六维扫描) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治资本风险 政治资本风险 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治事件分类 政治事件分类 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治威胁格局 政治威胁格局 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Presidency Trio Context Presidency Trio Context — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 定量 SWOT(数值+TOWS) 定量 SWOT(数值+TOWS) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 参考分析质量 参考分析质量 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治风险评估 政治风险评估 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 风险矩阵(5×5 可能性×影响) 风险矩阵(5×5 可能性×影响) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 情景预测(概率加权) 情景预测(概率加权) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Seat Projection Seat Projection — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 会议基线(全会日历) 会议基线(全会日历) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 重要性分类(五维评分表) 重要性分类(五维评分表) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治重要性评分 政治重要性评分 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 利益相关方影响评估 利益相关方影响评估 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 利益相关方地图(权力×一致) 利益相关方地图(权力×一致) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治 SWOT 分析 政治 SWOT 分析 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 综合摘要 综合摘要 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- Term Arc Term Arc — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 政治威胁格局分析 政治威胁格局分析 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 威胁模型(民主与制度) 威胁模型(民主与制度) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 选民细分 选民细分 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 投票模式 投票模式 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 万能牌与黑天鹅 万能牌与黑天鹅 — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
- 工作流审计(代理运行自评) 工作流审计(代理运行自评) — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的模板。 查看构件模板
方法论
- 方法论库索引 EU Parliament Monitor 使用的每一份分析工艺指南的索引 — 进入完整方法论库的入口。 查看方法论
- AI 驱动分析指南 所有代理式工作流遵循的权威 10 步 AI 驱动分析协议 — 规则 1–22 及第 10.5 步方法论反思,采用积极语气和彩色编码的 Mermaid 图表。 查看方法论
- Analytical Supplementary Methodology Analytical Supplementary Methodology — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的方法论。 查看方法论
- 分析工件目录 每个生成文章的工作流产生的 39 个分析产物的主目录 — 将每个产物映射到其方法论、模板、深度下限和 Mermaid 图表类型。 查看方法论
- Electoral Cycle Methodology Electoral Cycle Methodology — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的方法论。 查看方法论
- 选举领域方法论 欧盟范围选举分析方法论 — 预测、欧洲议会 361 席阈值及成员国层面的联盟数学,以及选民分群框架。 查看方法论
- Forward Projection Methodology Forward Projection Methodology — EU Parliament Monitor 分析库中的方法论。 查看方法论
- IMF 指标 → 文章类型映射 将 IMF 指标(WEO、Fiscal Monitor、IFS、BOP、ER、PCPS)映射到 EU Parliament Monitor 文章类型的权威参考 — 经济、货币、财政、贸易和 FDI 背景的主要数据源。 查看方法论
- OSINT 情报工艺标准 用于欧洲议会政治情报的 OSINT/INTOP 专业标准 — 信息源评估、归因、验证、分析可信度分级以及符合 GDPR 的收集。 查看方法论
- 分工件方法论 按产物划分的方法论说明 — 每种产物类型 34 个章节,附构建规则、质量信号以及在 C 阶段强制执行的行数下限。 查看方法论
- 按文档分析方法论 原子证据层方法论:用于提取、标注、评分并将单个 EP 文件(报告、动议、投票、委员会纪要)置于语境中的文档级指导。 查看方法论
- 政治事件分类指南 面向欧洲议会的政治分类法 — 对每个被分析的产物应用的行为者、立场、风险面与信息安全分类。 查看方法论
- 政治风险方法论 源自 Hack23 ISMS 的政治风险定量 5×5 可能性 × 影响评分 — 应用于欧洲议会的联盟、政策、预算、制度与地缘政治风险。 查看方法论
- 政治风格指南 编辑与政治文风指南 — 受《经济学人》启发的语气、平衡性、归因规则、Mermaid 图表约定以及对全部 14 种语言的多语言考量。 查看方法论
- 政治 SWOT 框架 为欧盟政治行为者、联盟与政策立场调整的 SWOT 框架 — 含定量权重、TOWS 策略生成,以及每个象限项目 ≥ 80 词的深度下限。 查看方法论
- 政治威胁框架 用于欧洲议会的六维民主威胁框架 — 以 STRIDE 风格列举制度、程序、信息、联盟、外部干预与地缘政治威胁。 查看方法论
- 战略扩展方法论 核心方法论的战略扩展 — 情景规划、魔鬼代言人分析、通配牌与黑天鹅、长视野预测以及跨运行综合。 查看方法论
- 结构化元数据方法论 对每种 EP 文件类型进行结构化元数据提取、来源追踪与交叉链接的方法论 — 实现可复现的分析及 GDPR 第 30 条合规。 查看方法论
- 综合方法论 综合与评分方法论 — 通过重要性评分、可信度分级以及交叉引用完整性检查,将多个产物整合为连贯的情报产品。 查看方法论
- 世界银行指标 → 文章类型映射 将世界银行非经济开放数据指标映射到 EU Parliament Monitor 文章类型 — 涵盖健康、教育、社会、环境、人口、治理与创新。 查看方法论
分析索引
以下每个工件均由聚合器读取并为本文做出了贡献。原始 manifest.json 包含完整的机器可读列表,包括门控结果历史。