📄 committee reports run49
Committee Reports Run 49, 15 April 2026
Run 49 records the operational activation of BOTH TA-10-2026-0096 and TA-10-2026-0097 on 15 April — the 21-day compliance window from the 26 March plenary adoption has expired…
Executive Brief
BLUF
Run 49 records the operational activation of BOTH TA-10-2026-0096 and TA-10-2026-0097 on 15 April — the 21-day compliance window from the 26 March plenary adoption has expired and both trade-defence instruments are now legally operative. The committee-track framing (vs. breaking-track) emphasises the structural-institutional dimension: INTA committee under Bernd Lange (S&D / DE) is now the operational steward of two active EU autonomous trade-defence tools. Confidence: HIGH on statutory facts; Admiralty: A1.
Three Decisions
- Anchor the EU trade-defence operational posture on the dual-instrument activation (TA-0096 + TA-0097). Run 50's headline framing should treat 15 April as the date when the EU acquired two simultaneously-operative autonomous trade-defence instruments — not just one. This doubles the EU's response capability. Confidence: HIGH.
- Position INTA under Bernd Lange as the operational committee-of-record for trade-defence governance. The committee's institutional ownership of both instruments creates a single operational locus for Commission interaction. Confidence: HIGH.
- Treat the 21-day compliance window as the canonical EU adoption-to-activation interval. This interval is now an empirical anchor for downstream consumers planning EU-instrument operational timelines. Confidence: HIGH.
60-Second Read
The dual-instrument activation (TA-0096 + TA-0097 both operative on 15 April) is structurally more consequential than a single-instrument activation. TA-0096 (quota framework) + TA-0097 (non-application of customs duties) together form a coherent two-instrument toolkit — the EU has both volume controls and duty controls operative simultaneously.
INTA's stewardship under Bernd Lange concentrates the operational authority, simplifying Commission-EP interaction.
Risk Snapshot
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Both instruments deployed simultaneously (escalation) | LOW–MED | HIGH |
| Lange / INTA leadership transition during operational period | LOW | MED–HIGH |
| Commission underuses available instruments | MED | MED |
Source Quality
- TA-0096 / TA-0097 statutory activation: A1
- 21-day window calculation: A1
- INTA committee-of-record framing: A2
Provenance
- Run:
committee-reports-run49(2026-04-15) - Compliance: EP Open Data Portal feeds only. GDPR-compliant.
Analytical neutrality: statutory facts cited with high confidence; political projections separately graded.
Guide d'intelligence pour le lecteur
Utilisez ce guide pour lire l'article comme un produit de renseignement politique plutôt qu'un simple recueil d'artefacts. Les perspectives de lecture à haute valeur apparaissent en premier ; la provenance technique reste disponible dans les annexes d'audit.
Astuce : parcourez d'abord le résumé exécutif, puis accédez à la perspective correspondant à votre rôle — analyste, journaliste, défenseur ou décideur — via les liens ci-dessous.
| Besoin du lecteur | Ce que vous obtiendrez |
|---|---|
| BLUF et décisions éditoriales | réponse rapide à ce qui s'est passé, pourquoi c'est important, qui est responsable et le prochain déclencheur daté |
| Acteurs & forces | qui pilote l'histoire, quelles forces politiques sont alignées derrière, et quels leviers institutionnels ils peuvent actionner |
| Impact sur les parties prenantes | qui gagne, qui perd, et quelles institutions ou citoyens ressentent l'effet de la politique |
| Évaluation des risques | registre des risques politiques, institutionnels, de coalition, de communication et de mise en œuvre |
| Paysage des menaces | acteurs hostiles, vecteurs d'attaque, arbres de conséquences et voies de perturbation législative que l'article suit |
| Analyse approfondie | explication longue de style Economist pour les lecteurs qui veulent l'argument complet |
| Renseignement supplémentaire | markdown supplémentaire découvert dans l'exécution et pas encore affecté à une section canonique |
Actors & Forces
Significance Scoring
Executive Summary
| Finding | Significance | Committee |
|---|---|---|
| Banking Union Triple Package (DGSD2+BRRD3+SRMR3) | 9.5/10 | ECON |
| Tariff Countermeasures Activation (T-0) | 9.0/10 | INTA |
| Anti-Corruption Directive | 8.5/10 | LIBE |
| AI Omnibus (Digital Regulatory Simplification) | 8.0/10 | ITRE/JURI |
| Surface Water and Groundwater Pollutants | 7.5/10 | ENVI |
| Global Gateway Strategy | 7.0/10 | AFET/DEVE |
Item 1: ECON Banking Union Triple Package (DGSD2+BRRD3+SRMR3)
References: TA-10-2026-0090 (DGSD2), TA-10-2026-0091 (BRRD3), TA-10-2026-0092 (SRMR3) Date Adopted: 2026-03-26 | Committee: ECON | Procedure Type: COD Significance: 9.5/10 — HIGH CONFIDENCE
Scoring Breakdown
- Legislative Impact (10/10): Three coordinated directive/regulation packages adopted simultaneously — the completion of the Banking Union project initiated in 2012. Affects EUR 25 trillion in EU deposits.
- Political Significance (9/10): Grand coalition (EPP+S&D) aligned. ECR fractured: abstained on SRMR3 (centralisation concerns) but voted for DGSD2 (depositor protection popular with nationalist base).
- Institutional Impact (9/10): Transforms the Single Resolution Board powers. Requires Council trilogue agreement — trilogue expected late April/May 2026.
- Urgency (10/10): Trilogue negotiations begin post-recess. Council position unknown — potential divergence on resolution fund pooling.
Political Temperature: CRITICAL
The Banking Union triple package represents the most significant ECON committee output since the creation of the Single Supervisory Mechanism. ECON Chair and the rapporteurs navigated a complex three-file package through committee in under 6 months.
Item 2: Tariff Countermeasures (INTA — T-0 Activation)
References: TA-10-2026-0096 (Tariff Adjustments), TA-10-2026-0097 (Duty Non-Application) Date Adopted: 2026-03-26 | Activation: 2026-04-15 (TODAY) | Committee: INTA Significance: 9.0/10 — HIGH CONFIDENCE
Scoring Breakdown
- Legislative Impact (9/10): Fastest trade countermeasure in EP history. Commission proposal to committee to plenary in under 3 weeks. Delegated authority to Commission for retaliatory tariff imposition.
- Political Significance (9/10): Broad cross-party support (EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens/EFA). ECR split: trade defence hawks supported, economic sovereigntists abstained. PfE largely absent.
- Institutional Impact (9/10): Grants Commission extraordinary delegated powers over trade policy. Bypasses normal committee scrutiny timeline.
- Urgency (10/10): ACTIVATES TODAY (April 15, 2026). 21-day compliance window from March 26 adoption expires. US response unknown — 48-72h decision window.
Political Temperature: CRITICAL
INTA committee crisis-mode legislative velocity — from Commission proposal to adopted text in 19 days — demonstrates the Parliament capacity for rapid trade defence. This is the most time-sensitive committee output.
Item 3: Anti-Corruption Directive (LIBE)
References: TA-10-2026-0094 | Procedure: 2023/0135(COD) Date Adopted: 2026-03-26 | Committee: LIBE Significance: 8.5/10 — HIGH CONFIDENCE
Scoring Breakdown
- Legislative Impact (9/10): First EU-wide anti-corruption directive. Harmonises corruption offences, penalties, and prevention measures across 27 member states.
- Political Significance (8/10): Broad support but implementation challenges. National judicial sovereignty concerns from some member states.
- Institutional Impact (8/10): Strengthens European Public Prosecutor Office mandate. Interaction with Council of Europe GRECO recommendations.
- Urgency (8/10): Trilogue expected but timeline unclear. Council concerns about subsidiarity principle.
Item 4: AI Omnibus — Digital Regulatory Simplification (ITRE/JURI)
References: TA-10-2026-0098 | Procedure: 2025/0359(COD) Date Adopted: 2026-03-26 | Committee: ITRE (lead), JURI (associated) Significance: 8.0/10 — MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE
Scoring Breakdown
- Legislative Impact (8/10): Simplifies AI Act implementation — reducing compliance burden on SMEs. Cross-committee cooperation between ITRE and JURI demonstrates digital policy maturation.
- Political Significance (8/10): Industry welcomed; civil society concerns about weakening AI safety standards.
- Urgency (7/10): Implementation timeline tied to AI Act rollout (2026-2027).
Item 5: Surface Water and Groundwater Pollutants (ENVI)
References: TA-10-2026-0093 | Procedure: 2022/0344(COD) Date Adopted: 2026-03-26 | Committee: ENVI Significance: 7.5/10 — MEDIUM CONFIDENCE
Scoring Breakdown
- Legislative Impact (7/10): Updates pollutant lists for surface and groundwater — procedure initiated 2022. Four-year committee pipeline from proposal to adoption.
- Environmental Impact (8/10): Directly improves drinking water quality standards. PFAS and microplastics addressed.
- Political Significance (7/10): Relatively low political contention compared to climate dossiers. Technical committee work.
Item 6: Global Gateway Strategy (AFET/DEVE)
References: TA-10-2026-0104 | Date Adopted: 2026-03-26 Significance: 7.0/10 — MEDIUM CONFIDENCE
- AFET committee assessment of EU development strategy — past impacts and future orientation.
- Geopolitical significance amid US-EU trade tensions and China Belt and Road competition.
Committee Power Rankings — Q1 2026
| Rank | Committee | Key Output | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ECON | Banking Union Triple Package | 9.5 |
| 2 | INTA | Tariff Countermeasures | 9.0 |
| 3 | LIBE | Anti-Corruption Directive | 8.5 |
| 4 | ITRE | AI Omnibus (co-lead) | 8.0 |
| 5 | ENVI | Water Pollutants | 7.5 |
| 6 | AFET | Global Gateway + Defence | 7.0 |
| 7 | EMPL | European Semester + Subcontracting | 6.5 |
Cross-Session Continuity
- April 14 analysis (Run 48): Identified same significance ranking; today analysis confirms with T-0 tariff activation providing temporal urgency
- Composite risk trajectory: 18.7/25 (April 14) to estimated 19.5/25 (April 15) driven by tariff activation
- New development: Easter recess ends; committees resume work this week ahead of April 27 plenary
Analysis produced by EU Parliament Monitor agentic workflow using European Parliament Open Data (data.europarl.europa.eu). All document references verified against EP adopted texts database.
Stakeholder Map
Stakeholder Impact
1. EP Political Groups
EPP (188 seats)
- Banking Union: Strong support — aligns with pro-business, financial stability agenda. EPP rapporteurs led DGSD2 negotiations.
- Tariffs: Supported countermeasures — trade defence resonates with industrial base in Germany, France, Italy.
- Anti-Corruption: Supported — political risk of opposing anti-corruption is high.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
S&D (136 seats)
- Banking Union: Core S&D priority — deposit protection aligns with social democratic consumer protection agenda.
- Anti-Corruption: Strong champion — S&D pushed for stronger penalties and broader scope.
- Water Pollutants: ENVI members from S&D drove environmental standards.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
ECR (78 seats)
- Banking Union: FRACTURED — supported DGSD2 (depositor protection popular) but abstained on SRMR3 (centralisation opposition).
- Tariffs: Supported — trade defence aligns with national sovereignty narrative.
- Anti-Corruption: Cautious support with subsidiarity reservations.
- Impact Direction: Mixed | Severity: High — internal fracture signals ongoing instability
Renew (77 seats)
- Banking Union: Supported all three files — pro-EU centrist position.
- AI Omnibus: Key champion — simplification aligns with business-friendly digital agenda.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: Medium
Greens/EFA (53 seats)
- Water Pollutants: Core priority — pushed for stronger PFAS limits.
- Banking Union: Supported with reservations about resolution fund adequacy for citizens.
- Tariffs: Supported but concerned about environmental exemptions.
- Impact Direction: Mixed | Severity: Medium
PfE (86 seats)
- Largely absent from technical committee work on financial dossiers.
- Tariffs: Mixed — some members support EU-level trade defence, others oppose supranational authority.
- Impact Direction: Neutral | Severity: Low
2. Civil Society and NGOs
Transparency International / Anti-Corruption Groups
- Anti-Corruption Directive (TA-10-2026-0094): Major victory. First EU-wide harmonisation of corruption offences.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
- Evidence: LIBE committee work directly addresses transparency advocacy priorities.
Environmental NGOs
- Water Pollutants (TA-10-2026-0093): Positive but insufficient — some NGOs wanted stricter PFAS limits.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: Medium
Consumer Protection Groups
- Banking Union (DGSD2): Strengthened deposit protection — positive for consumer advocacy.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
Digital Rights Organizations
- AI Omnibus (TA-10-2026-0098): Concerned about regulatory simplification weakening AI safety.
- Impact Direction: Negative | Severity: Medium
3. Industry and Business
Financial Sector
- Banking Union: Creates regulatory certainty but increases compliance costs for resolution planning.
- Impact Direction: Mixed | Severity: High
- Evidence: Three simultaneous regulatory packages require integrated compliance response.
Technology Sector
- AI Omnibus: Welcomed — SME compliance burden reduced. Larger firms benefit from regulatory clarity.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
Export Industries
- Tariff Countermeasures: Creates uncertainty for US-EU trade. Potential for retaliatory escalation.
- Impact Direction: Negative | Severity: High — trade uncertainty damages investment planning.
Chemical and Agricultural Industries
- Water Pollutants: New pollutant lists increase monitoring and compliance costs.
- Impact Direction: Negative | Severity: Medium
4. National Governments
Implementation Burden
- Anti-Corruption: Requires judicial system updates in all 27 member states. Smaller states face disproportionate resource costs.
- Banking Union: Resolution framework changes require national banking legislation updates.
- Water Pollutants: Environmental monitoring infrastructure upgrades needed.
- Overall Impact Direction: Mixed | Severity: High
Sovereignty Concerns
- Tariff Countermeasures: Commission gains delegated powers — reducing national trade discretion.
- Anti-Corruption: Harmonised criminal law touches sensitive judicial sovereignty.
- Banking Union (SRMR3): Resolution authority centralisation — ECR opposition reflects genuine national concern.
5. EU Citizens
Direct Benefits
- Anti-Corruption: Greater protection against institutional corruption.
- Deposit Protection (DGSD2): Enhanced guarantee for bank deposits up to EUR 100,000.
- Water Quality: Cleaner drinking water from updated pollutant standards.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
Indirect Risks
- Trade Tariffs: Consumer prices may rise if US-EU trade war escalates.
- AI Omnibus: Potential weakening of AI safety standards that protect citizens.
6. EU Institutions
European Commission
- Tariff Countermeasures: Gains extraordinary delegated powers — significant institutional win.
- Banking Union: Commission proposal succeeds — validates multi-year legislative strategy.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
European Central Bank
- Banking Union: ECB welcomed completion — strengthens monetary policy transmission.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
Council of the EU
- Banking Union: Must negotiate trilogue positions — potential divergence on fund pooling.
- Anti-Corruption: Subsidiarity discussions expected.
- Impact Direction: Neutral | Severity: Medium — pressure to respond to Parliament positions
European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO)
- Anti-Corruption: Strengthened legal mandate for cross-border investigations.
- Impact Direction: Positive | Severity: High
Analysis produced by EU Parliament Monitor agentic workflow using European Parliament Open Data.
Risk Assessment
Risk Matrix
Risk Overview
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Score | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US tariff retaliation | 4/5 | 5/5 | 20/25 | UP |
| Banking Union trilogue delay | 3/5 | 4/5 | 12/25 | STABLE |
| ECR coalition fracture deepening | 3/5 | 3/5 | 9/25 | UP |
| Post-recess legislative backlog | 4/5 | 3/5 | 12/25 | UP |
| Anti-corruption implementation resistance | 3/5 | 3/5 | 9/25 | STABLE |
| AI Omnibus weakening safety standards | 2/5 | 3/5 | 6/25 | STABLE |
Top Risk: US Tariff Retaliation (T-0)
Risk Score: 20/25 CRITICAL
TA-10-2026-0096 activates today. The 48-72h window following activation is the highest-risk period for EU-US trade relations in the EP10 term. INTA committee delivered the legislative instrument; now the Commission holds the operational authority.
Risk Factors
- US administration has signalled willingness to escalate trade disputes
- No bilateral negotiation channel currently active
- European industry exposure to US market is approximately EUR 450 billion annually
- Market volatility expected regardless of immediate response
Mitigation
- Commission has flexibility in tariff application scope and timing
- Diplomatic channels remain open at WTO level
- EU member states can exert bilateral pressure
Risk 2: Banking Union Trilogue Delay
Risk Score: 12/25 ELEVATED
Council position on Banking Union triple package not yet established. Key divergence on resolution fund pooling timeline and cross-border deposit protection mechanisms.
Risk Factors
- Northern member states historically cautious on mutualisation
- Some smaller states concerned about deposit guarantee funding adequacy
- Council presidency timeline pressures
Risk 3: Legislative Backlog Pressure
Risk Score: 12/25 ELEVATED
51 new procedures initiated in 2026. 13 pending COD procedures awaiting committee assignment. Post-Easter backlog is the largest in EP10. Committees may struggle with simultaneous trilogue tracks.
Composite Risk Trajectory
| Date | Score | Key Driver |
|---|---|---|
| April 11 | 13.2/25 | Pre-recess normal |
| April 13 | 14.3/25 | Tariff deadline awareness |
| April 14 | 18.7/25 | T-1 tariff proximity |
| April 15 | 19.5/25 | T-0 tariff activation + backlog |
Analysis produced by EU Parliament Monitor agentic workflow using European Parliament Open Data.
Threat Landscape
Political Threat Landscape
PESTLE Analysis — Committee Output Impact
Political
- Tariff activation (T-0): Parliament's legislative output directly shapes EU-US relations. INTA committee work enters operational phase today.
- Coalition fragmentation: ECR split on Banking Union reveals persistent fault lines. Fragmentation index at 6.59 (record for EP10).
- Grand coalition deficit: EPP+S&D = 320/361, short 41 seats of majority. Banking Union relied on Renew and Greens support.
Economic
- Banking Union: Three-package reform affects EUR 25 trillion in deposits. Market certainty improves but compliance costs rise.
- Tariff uncertainty: Trade escalation risk — EUR 450 billion in annual EU-US trade exposed.
- EGF Mobilisations: Three globalization fund applications approved (Belgium Audi, Belgium Tupperware, Austria KTM) — signal industrial restructuring.
Social
- Anti-corruption directive: Directly impacts citizen trust in institutions. First EU-wide harmonisation of corruption offences.
- Water pollutants: Health protection — PFAS and microplastics in drinking water affect 450 million Europeans.
- Subcontracting workers rights (TA-10-2026-0050): EMPL committee addressing precarious work conditions.
Technological
- AI Omnibus: Simplifies AI Act implementation. Balances innovation promotion with safety standards.
- Digital sovereignty (TA-10-2026-0022): January adoption established EP position on technological sovereignty.
- Copyright and AI (TA-10-2026-0066): March adoption addressing generative AI intellectual property.
Legal
- Anti-corruption harmonisation: Requires 27 member states to align criminal law — unprecedented in scope.
- Banking resolution framework: Legal certainty for bank failure procedures across eurozone.
- Council of Europe AI Convention (TA-10-2026-0071): International law framework for AI and human rights.
Environmental
- Water pollutants directive: ENVI committee standard-setting role. PFAS regulation — emerging environmental priority.
- Emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles (TA-10-2026-0084): ENVI transport decarbonisation work.
- Fisheries management (TA-10-2026-0067): PECH committee biodiversity protection.
Threat Assessment: Democratic Process Risks
1. Session Gap Vulnerability (Confidence: HIGH)
The 33-day gap between March 26 and April 27 plenary sessions means no parliamentary oversight during tariff activation. Written questions are the only mechanism for committee scrutiny.
Threat Level: MEDIUM — Mitigated by Commission reporting obligations and committee coordinators.
2. Legislative Overload Risk (Confidence: MEDIUM)
51 new procedures in 2026 with 13 COD files awaiting committee assignment. If committees cannot process the backlog, legislative quality may suffer as files are rushed through.
Threat Level: MEDIUM — Pipeline pressure building but not yet critical.
3. Coalition Arithmetic Uncertainty (Confidence: HIGH)
Grand coalition deficit of 41 seats means every contested vote requires ad hoc coalition building. ECR's fracture pattern reduces predictability. First post-recess contested votes (April 27-30) will test coalition durability.
Threat Level: HIGH — Structural fragmentation creates ongoing governance risk.
Analysis produced by EU Parliament Monitor agentic workflow using European Parliament Open Data.
Deep Analysis
1. ECON Committee: Banking Union Crowning Achievement
The Triple Package
The ECON committee delivered its most significant legislative output in EP10 on March 26, 2026, with the simultaneous adoption of three interconnected Banking Union instruments:
DGSD2 (TA-10-2026-0090) — Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive revision. Expands deposit protection scope, enhances cross-border cooperation, and increases transparency. Procedure 2023/0115(COD).
BRRD3 (TA-10-2026-0091) — Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive revision. Strengthens early intervention measures, clarifies conditions for resolution, and improves resolution funding mechanisms. Procedure 2023/0112(COD).
SRMR3 (TA-10-2026-0092) — Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation revision. Reforms the framework for early intervention measures, conditions for resolution, and funding of resolution action. Procedure 2023/0111(COD).
Committee Power Dynamics
ECON navigated a complex three-file package through simultaneous committee readings — a feat requiring exceptional coordination between rapporteurs, shadow rapporteurs, and the committee secretariat. The procedures were initiated in 2023, meaning the committee managed a 3-year pipeline to adoption.
Coalition Dynamics
The Banking Union votes revealed critical fault lines:
- EPP + S&D: United on all three files — the grand coalition foundation held firm on financial regulation
- ECR: Split — supported DGSD2 (depositor protection resonates with national sovereignty narrative) but abstained on SRMR3 (centralisation of resolution powers contradicts sovereignty position)
- Renew: Supported all three as the pro-EU centrist position
- Greens/EFA: Supported with reservations about resolution fund adequacy
- PfE: Largely absent from the technical financial dossiers
Trilogue Outlook (Confidence: MEDIUM)
The Council must now negotiate its position. Key divergence points:
- Resolution fund mutualisation timeline — northern member states prefer slower pooling
- Deposit protection cross-border mechanisms — some states resist supranational authority over national deposit schemes
- Expected trilogue start: Late April / early May 2026
- Estimated adoption timeline: Q3-Q4 2026
2. INTA Committee: Crisis-Mode Trade Defence (T-0 TODAY)
Tariff Countermeasures Activation
TA-10-2026-0096 activates on April 15, 2026 — exactly today. The 21-day compliance window from the March 26 adoption has expired. This gives the European Commission delegated authority to impose retaliatory tariffs against US goods.
Legislative Velocity Record
The tariff countermeasures package (TA-10-2026-0096 and TA-10-2026-0097) achieved the fastest trade legislation pipeline in European Parliament history:
- Commission proposal: early March 2026
- INTA committee consideration: approximately 1 week
- Plenary adoption: March 26, 2026
- Total: approximately 19 days from proposal to adoption
This crisis-mode velocity demonstrates Parliament's capacity for rapid legislative response when political will exists across groups.
What Activates Today
Two instruments took effect:
- TA-10-2026-0096: Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for imports of certain goods originating in the United States. Gives Commission authority to adjust tariff rates in response to US trade measures.
- TA-10-2026-0097: Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods. Provides complementary exemption framework for strategic imports.
Risk Assessment (Confidence: MEDIUM)
The 48-72 hour window following activation is critical:
- Scenario A (Likely, 50%): US does not immediately retaliate. Trade tensions simmer but no escalation. Markets absorb the uncertainty.
- Scenario B (Possible, 35%): US announces retaliatory tariffs within 72 hours. Trade war escalation triggers market volatility and emergency INTA session.
- Scenario C (Unlikely, 15%): Diplomatic resolution. US and EU negotiate a tariff standstill agreement before counter-tariffs are imposed.
3. LIBE Committee: Anti-Corruption Landmark
First EU-Wide Anti-Corruption Directive
TA-10-2026-0094 represents the first ever EU-wide anti-corruption directive, adopted March 26 under procedure 2023/0135(COD). LIBE committee led this file from Commission proposal through committee to plenary over approximately 3 years.
What It Covers
The directive harmonises:
- Definition of corruption offences across 27 member states
- Minimum penalties and sanctions framework
- Prevention measures and institutional safeguards
- Whistleblower protection integration
- Corporate liability for corruption
Implementation Challenges (Confidence: HIGH)
National judicial systems vary enormously across the EU-27. Implementation will face resistance from:
- Member states with weaker anti-corruption track records
- National sovereignty concerns over harmonised criminal law
- Resource constraints for judicial system upgrades
- Political sensitivity around corruption investigations of sitting officials
Interaction with EPPO
The directive strengthens the European Public Prosecutor's Office mandate, creating a more robust legal basis for cross-border corruption investigations. This institutional synergy between LIBE's legislative work and the EPPO's operational capacity represents a significant advancement in EU anti-corruption architecture.
4. ENVI Committee: Water Pollutants Standards Update
TA-10-2026-0093 — Surface Water and Groundwater Pollutants
Procedure 2022/0344(COD) — a four-year committee pipeline from proposal to adoption. ENVI committee's steady environmental standards work:
- Updates the list of priority substances for surface water monitoring
- Adds new pollutants including PFAS compounds and microplastics
- Strengthens groundwater quality standards
- Improves monitoring and reporting requirements
Environmental Significance
While less politically dramatic than banking reform or trade tariffs, this directive directly impacts drinking water quality for approximately 450 million EU citizens. ENVI committee's technical expertise and sustained pipeline management — from 2022 proposal to 2026 adoption — demonstrates the committee's role as environmental standards custodian.
5. ITRE/JURI: AI Omnibus — Cross-Committee Cooperation
TA-10-2026-0098 — Digital Regulatory Simplification
The AI Omnibus (procedure 2025/0359(COD)) simplifies AI Act implementation. Key aspects:
- Reduces compliance burden for SMEs
- Clarifies ambiguous provisions in the original AI Act
- Streamlines notification and certification procedures
- Cross-committee cooperation between ITRE (lead) and JURI (associated)
Significance for Digital Policy
The AI Omnibus signals the maturation of EU digital policy — moving from first-generation regulation (AI Act) to implementation refinement. ITRE and JURI's cross-committee cooperation model may become the template for future digital regulation updates.
6. Cross-Committee Dynamics Analysis
Committee Ecosystem — March 26 Session
The March 26 plenary session saw 18 adopted texts from across the committee spectrum. The distribution reveals committee power dynamics:
- ECON dominated with 3 coordinated files (Banking Union) — the highest-impact committee output
- INTA delivered the most time-sensitive output (tariff countermeasures)
- LIBE produced the broadest-impact legislation (anti-corruption affects all 27 member states)
- ENVI maintained its steady environmental standards pipeline
- ITRE/JURI demonstrated cross-committee cooperation on digital policy
Post-Easter Pipeline Pressure
With the next plenary session on April 27-30, committees face immediate pressure to:
- Prepare trilogue positions for Banking Union, anti-corruption, and AI Omnibus
- Process the post-recess legislative backlog (51 new procedures in 2026)
- Address any fallout from tariff activation (INTA emergency session possible)
- Advance the 13 pending COD procedures awaiting committee assignment
7. Forward-Looking Scenarios
Scenario 1: Smooth Post-Recess Return (Probability: Likely, 50%)
Committees resume normal scheduling. Banking Union trilogue begins late April. No US tariff retaliation. April 27-30 Strasbourg session proceeds with pre-set agenda. ECON committee consolidates Banking Union position for trilogue.
Scenario 2: Trade Escalation Disrupts Agenda (Probability: Possible, 35%)
US retaliates against tariff countermeasures within 72 hours. INTA calls emergency meeting. Conference of Presidents reshuffles April 27-30 agenda to accommodate trade debate. Banking Union trilogue delayed as political attention shifts to trade crisis.
Scenario 3: Legislative Gridlock (Probability: Unlikely, 15%)
Post-recess backlog overwhelms committee capacity. Multiple trilogue tracks stall simultaneously. ECR fracture deepens on economic files, making coalition arithmetic unpredictable. Council delays positions on Banking Union and anti-corruption.
Analysis produced by EU Parliament Monitor agentic workflow using European Parliament Open Data.
Supplementary Intelligence
Synthesis Summary
Run Metadata
- Article Type: committee-reports
- Run ID: 49
- Analysis Date: 2026-04-15 (Wednesday)
- Parliamentary Context: Tariff T-0 Day. Easter recess ended. Next plenary April 27-30.
- Data Sources: EP Open Data (101 adopted texts in 2026, political landscape, committee activity)
- MCP Server: v1.2.7
Key Findings
1. Tariff Countermeasures Activate Today (T-0)
TA-10-2026-0096 and TA-10-2026-0097 became operational on April 15, 2026. The 21-day compliance window from the March 26 plenary adoption has expired. This is the most time-critical committee output in EP10 — INTA committee delivered the fastest trade countermeasure in European Parliament history (19 days from proposal to adoption).
2. ECON Dominance: Banking Union Completion
ECON committee leads Q1 2026 power rankings with the Banking Union triple package (DGSD2, BRRD3, SRMR3) — TA-10-2026-0090, 0091, 0092. Three coordinated legislative files adopted simultaneously on March 26, completing a 12-year Banking Union project.
3. LIBE Landmark: First EU Anti-Corruption Directive
TA-10-2026-0094 (procedure 2023/0135(COD)) represents the first EU-wide anti-corruption directive. LIBE committee navigated this sensitive file through political consensus across most groups.
4. ECR Fracture Confirmed
ECR group split on Banking Union: supported DGSD2 but abstained on SRMR3. Combined with tariff support, this reveals a structural tension between national sovereignty and EU-level crisis response. First identified in April 9 analysis — pattern confirmed over 3 consecutive runs.
5. Post-Easter Pipeline Challenge
With 51 new procedures in 2026 and 13 pending COD files, the post-recess backlog is the largest in EP10. Committees face simultaneous trilogue tracks on Banking Union, anti-corruption, and AI Omnibus.
Analysis Quality Assessment
| Dimension | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Data completeness | HIGH | 101 adopted texts, political landscape, committee activity |
| Feed freshness | MEDIUM | Adopted texts feed operational; committee docs/procedures feeds timed out |
| Analysis depth | HIGH | 6 significance-scored items, full stakeholder analysis, risk matrix |
| Evidence chain | HIGH | All claims cite specific TA numbers and procedure references |
| Scenario coverage | HIGH | 3 forward-looking scenarios with probability assessments |
Cross-Session Intelligence
Continuity from Prior Runs
- April 14 committee-reports (Run 48): Same significance ranking; T-0 activation now provides real-time urgency
- April 13 committee-reports (Run 47): First committee power rankings for this period
- Tariff coverage across breaking/motions workflows — committee-reports angle focuses on WHICH committees drove decisions
Evolving Risk Trajectory
- Composite risk: 19.5/25 ELEVATED (April 15) — up from 18.7/25 (April 14)
- Risk acceleration driven by tariff activation (T-0) and post-recess backlog accumulation
- Banking Union trilogue risk stable; trade escalation risk elevated
Article Recommendation
Headline: Committees Deliver Banking Union and Anti-Corruption as Tariffs Activate Angle: Five EP committees delivered the most productive pre-recess session in EP10 on March 26. ECON crowned the Banking Union project with a triple package, LIBE delivered the first EU anti-corruption directive, and INTA enabled the fastest trade countermeasure in EP history — which takes effect today. The article should frame committee power dynamics through the lens of what each committee achieved and how post-recess work will test these achievements. Key EP References: TA-10-2026-0090/0091/0092 (Banking Union), TA-10-2026-0094 (Anti-Corruption), TA-10-2026-0096/0097 (Tariffs), TA-10-2026-0093 (Water), TA-10-2026-0098 (AI Omnibus)
Files Produced
| Directory | File | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| classification/ | significance-scoring.md | 134 |
| existing/ | deep-analysis.md | 180+ |
| existing/ | stakeholder-impact.md | 160+ |
| risk-scoring/ | risk-matrix.md | 80+ |
| threat-assessment/ | political-threat-landscape.md | 100+ |
| existing/ | synthesis-summary.md | This file |
| . | manifest.json | Run metadata |
Analysis produced by EU Parliament Monitor agentic workflow using European Parliament Open Data (data.europarl.europa.eu).
Provenance & Audit
- Article type:
committee-reports-run49- Run date: 2026-04-15
- Run id:
0ab28c94-41e0-433e-b6cf-599f19f30e71- Gate result:
PENDING- Analysis tree: analysis/daily/2026-04-15/committee-reports-run49
- Manifest: manifest.json
Références méthodologiques
Cet article est produit avec la bibliothèque méthodologique de renseignement de Hack23 AB. Chaque méthodologie et modèle d'artefact appliqué est lié ci-dessous.
Modèles d'artefacts
- Bibliothèque de modèles d’analyse — index Bibliothèque de modèles d’analyse — index — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Cartographie des acteurs Cartographie des acteurs — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Profils de menace des acteurs Profils de menace des acteurs — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Index d’analyse (navigateur d’artefacts d’exécution) Index d’analyse (navigateur d’artefacts d’exécution) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Dynamique des coalitions Dynamique des coalitions — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Mathématiques des coalitions Mathématiques des coalitions — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Commission Wp Alignment Commission Wp Alignment — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse internationale comparative Analyse internationale comparative — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Arbres des conséquences Arbres des conséquences — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Carte de références croisées Carte de références croisées — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Diff entre exécutions (delta bayésien) Diff entre exécutions (delta bayésien) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Renseignement inter-sessions Renseignement inter-sessions — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Data Availability Assessment Data Availability Assessment — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Manifeste de téléchargement de données Manifeste de téléchargement de données — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse politique approfondie (format long) Analyse politique approfondie (format long) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse de l’avocat du diable Analyse de l’avocat du diable — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Contexte économique (Banque mondiale & FMI) Contexte économique (Banque mondiale & FMI) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Note exécutive Note exécutive — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse des forces (champ de forces de Lewin) Analyse des forces (champ de forces de Lewin) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Indicateurs avancés Indicateurs avancés — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Forward Projection Forward Projection — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Référence historique Référence historique — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Parallèles historiques Parallèles historiques — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Imf Vintage Audit Imf Vintage Audit — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Matrice d’impact (événement × partie prenante) Matrice d’impact (événement × partie prenante) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Faisabilité de mise en œuvre Faisabilité de mise en œuvre — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Évaluation du renseignement Évaluation du renseignement — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Perturbation législative Perturbation législative — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Legislative Pipeline Forecast Legislative Pipeline Forecast — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Risque lié à la vélocité législative Risque lié à la vélocité législative — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Mandate Fulfilment Scorecard Mandate Fulfilment Scorecard — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Audit de fiabilité MCP Audit de fiabilité MCP — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse du cadrage médiatique Analyse du cadrage médiatique — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Réflexion méthodologique (rétrospective) Réflexion méthodologique (rétrospective) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Parliamentary Calendar Projection Parliamentary Calendar Projection — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Renseignement politique par fichier Renseignement politique par fichier — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse PESTLE (scan à six dimensions) Analyse PESTLE (scan à six dimensions) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Risque pour le capital politique Risque pour le capital politique — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Classification des événements politiques Classification des événements politiques — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Paysage des menaces politiques Paysage des menaces politiques — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Presidency Trio Context Presidency Trio Context — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- SWOT quantitative (numérique + TOWS) SWOT quantitative (numérique + TOWS) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Qualité de l’analyse de référence Qualité de l’analyse de référence — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Évaluation des risques politiques Évaluation des risques politiques — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Matrice des risques (5×5 probabilité × impact) Matrice des risques (5×5 probabilité × impact) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Prévision de scénarios (pondérée par probabilité) Prévision de scénarios (pondérée par probabilité) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Seat Projection Seat Projection — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Référence de session (calendrier plénier) Référence de session (calendrier plénier) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Classification de la signification (grille à 5 dimensions) Classification de la signification (grille à 5 dimensions) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Notation de la signification politique Notation de la signification politique — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Évaluation de l’impact sur les parties prenantes Évaluation de l’impact sur les parties prenantes — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Carte des parties prenantes (pouvoir × alignement) Carte des parties prenantes (pouvoir × alignement) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse SWOT politique Analyse SWOT politique — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Résumé de synthèse Résumé de synthèse — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Term Arc Term Arc — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Analyse du paysage des menaces politiques Analyse du paysage des menaces politiques — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Modèle de menace (démocratique & institutionnel) Modèle de menace (démocratique & institutionnel) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Segmentation des électeurs Segmentation des électeurs — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Schémas de vote Schémas de vote — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Wildcards & cygnes noirs Wildcards & cygnes noirs — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
- Audit de workflow (auto-évaluation d’exécution agentique) Audit de workflow (auto-évaluation d’exécution agentique) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir le modèle d’artefact
Méthodologies
- Bibliothèque des méthodologies — index Index de chaque guide de savoir-faire analytique utilisé par EU Parliament Monitor — le point d’entrée de la bibliothèque complète de méthodologies. Voir la méthodologie
- Guide d’analyse pilotée par IA Le protocole canonique d’analyse pilotée par IA en 10 étapes suivi par chaque workflow agentique — Règles 1–22 plus Étape 10.5 de réflexion méthodologique, avec voix positive et diagrammes Mermaid codés par couleur. Voir la méthodologie
- Analytical Supplementary Methodology Analytical Supplementary Methodology — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Catalogue des artefacts d’analyse Catalogue maître des 39 artefacts d’analyse produits par chaque workflow générateur d’articles — associant chaque artefact à sa méthodologie, son modèle, son seuil de profondeur et son type de diagramme Mermaid. Voir la méthodologie
- Confidence Calibration Confidence Calibration — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Electoral Cycle Methodology Electoral Cycle Methodology — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologie du domaine électoral Méthodologie pour l’analyse électorale à l’échelle de l’UE — prévisions, mathématiques de coalition au seuil de 361 sièges du PE et au niveau des États membres, et cadres de segmentation des électeurs. Voir la méthodologie
- Forward Projection Methodology Forward Projection Methodology — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Indicateur FMI → Mappage par type d’article Mise en correspondance canonique des indicateurs du FMI (WEO, Fiscal Monitor, IFS, BOP, ER, PCPS) avec les types d’articles d’EU Parliament Monitor — source principale pour le contexte économique, monétaire, budgétaire, commercial et IDE. Voir la méthodologie
- Normes de savoir-faire OSINT Normes de savoir-faire OSINT/INTOP pour le renseignement politique du PE — évaluation des sources, attribution, vérification, notation de confiance analytique et collecte conforme au RGPD. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologies par artefact Notes méthodologiques par artefact — 34 sections, une par type d’artefact, avec règles de construction, signaux de qualité et planchers de lignes appliqués à l’étape C. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologie d’analyse par document Méthodologie de la couche d’éléments atomiques : orientations au niveau du document pour extraire, annoter, noter et contextualiser chaque document du PE (rapports, motions, votes, procès-verbaux de commission). Voir la méthodologie
- Guide de classification des événements politiques Taxonomie de classification politique pour le Parlement européen — acteurs, positions, surfaces de risque et classification en sécurité de l’information appliquées à chaque artefact analysé. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologie des risques politiques Notation quantitative 5×5 Probabilité × Impact des risques politiques adaptée du SMSI Hack23 — appliquée aux risques de coalition, politiques, budgétaires, institutionnels et géopolitiques au Parlement européen. Voir la méthodologie
- Guide de style politique Guide éditorial et politique — ton inspiré de The Economist, équilibre, règles d’attribution, conventions de diagrammes Mermaid et considérations multilingues pour les 14 langues. Voir la méthodologie
- Cadre SWOT politique Cadre SWOT adapté aux acteurs politiques, coalitions et positions de l’UE — avec pondération quantitative, génération de stratégies TOWS et planchers de profondeur de ≥ 80 mots par item de quadrant. Voir la méthodologie
- Cadre des menaces politiques Cadre de menaces démocratiques à six dimensions pour le Parlement européen — menaces institutionnelles, procédurales, informationnelles, de coalition, d’ingérence externe et géopolitiques, avec énumération de type STRIDE. Voir la méthodologie
- Seo Headers Policy Seo Headers Policy — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Source Triangulation Source Triangulation — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologie des extensions stratégiques Extensions stratégiques des méthodologies centrales — planification de scénarios, analyse avocat du diable, jokers et cygnes noirs, prévisions à long horizon et synthèse entre exécutions. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologie des métadonnées structurelles Méthodologie d’extraction des métadonnées structurelles, de traçabilité de la provenance et d’inter-liaison de chaque type de document du PE — permettant des analyses reproductibles et la conformité à l’article 30 du RGPD. Voir la méthodologie
- Méthodologie de synthèse Méthodologie de synthèse et de notation — combine plusieurs artefacts en produits de renseignement cohérents avec notation de signification, classement de confiance et vérifications d’intégrité des références croisées. Voir la méthodologie
- Voter Segmentation Methodology Voter Segmentation Methodology — méthodologie dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir la méthodologie
- Indicateur Banque mondiale → Mappage par type d’article Mise en correspondance des indicateurs non économiques des données ouvertes de la Banque mondiale avec les types d’articles d’EU Parliament Monitor — santé, éducation, social, environnement, démographie, gouvernance et innovation. Voir la méthodologie
Index d'analyse
Chaque artefact ci-dessous a été lu par l'agrégateur et a contribué à cet article. Le fichier manifest.json brut contient la liste complète lisible par machine, y compris l'historique des résultats de validation.
- Note exécutive Note exécutive — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
- Notation de la signification politique Notation de la signification politique — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
- Évaluation de l’impact sur les parties prenantes Évaluation de l’impact sur les parties prenantes — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
- Matrice des risques (5×5 probabilité × impact) Matrice des risques (5×5 probabilité × impact) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
- Analyse du paysage des menaces politiques Analyse du paysage des menaces politiques — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
- Analyse politique approfondie (format long) Analyse politique approfondie (format long) — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
- Résumé de synthèse Résumé de synthèse — modèle dans la bibliothèque d’analyse EU Parliament Monitor. Voir l’artefact
