Press n or j to go to the next uncovered block, b, p or k for the previous block.
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 | 27x 27x 45x 23x 22x 14x 27x 36x 22x 27x 27x 27x 36x 27x 34x 27x 27x 34x 17x 36x 36x 36x 27x 45x 29x 36x 45x 29x 16x 16x 16x 16x 16x 16x 16x 21x 10x 21x 6x 21x 6x 11x 11x 11x 11x 11x 7x 6x 6x 7x 6x 12x 4x 3x 12x 12x 3x 9x 12x 12x 12x 12x 12x 12x 15x 15x 11x 15x 15x 8x 15x 8x 15x 7x | // SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2024-2026 Hack23 AB
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
/**
* @module Generators/AnalysisBuilders
* @description Pure functions that construct {@link DeepAnalysis} objects from
* strategy-specific article data. Each builder extracts the "5W + Impact"
* framework fields from raw parliamentary data so the HTML renderer can
* produce a uniform deep-analysis section across all article types.
*
* These mappers never fetch data or produce side effects — they only transform.
*/
import type {
DeepAnalysis,
StakeholderOutcome,
ActionConsequence,
PoliticalMistake,
VotingRecord,
VotingPattern,
VotingAnomaly,
MotionsQuestion,
WeekAheadData,
DateRange,
CommitteeData,
} from '../types/index.js';
import type { PipelineData } from './propositions-content.js';
import type { BreakingNewsFeedData } from '../types/index.js';
// ─── Helpers ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
/**
* Derive stakeholder outcomes from voting records.
* Groups that win votes are "winners"; groups on the losing side are "losers".
*
* @param records - Voting records
* @param patterns - Voting pattern data
* @returns Stakeholder outcome assessments
*/
function deriveStakeholderOutcomesFromVoting(
records: readonly VotingRecord[],
patterns: readonly VotingPattern[]
): StakeholderOutcome[] {
const outcomes: StakeholderOutcome[] = [];
// High-cohesion groups that vote with majority are winners
for (const pattern of patterns) {
if (pattern.cohesion > 0.8 && pattern.participation > 0.7) {
outcomes.push({
actor: pattern.group,
outcome: 'winner',
reason: `High cohesion (${(pattern.cohesion * 100).toFixed(0)}%) with strong participation — disciplined bloc that shapes outcomes`,
});
} else if (pattern.cohesion < 0.5) {
outcomes.push({
actor: pattern.group,
outcome: 'loser',
reason: `Low cohesion (${(pattern.cohesion * 100).toFixed(0)}%) — internal divisions weaken bargaining power`,
});
}
}
// Adopted motions → the proposing side wins
for (const record of records.slice(0, 3)) {
if (record.result?.toLowerCase().includes('adopt')) {
outcomes.push({
actor: 'Majority coalition',
outcome: 'winner',
reason: `"${record.title}" adopted (${record.votes.for} for vs ${record.votes.against} against)`,
});
}
}
return outcomes;
}
/**
* Derive action→consequence chains from voting records and anomalies.
*
* @param records - Voting records
* @param anomalies - Detected anomalies
* @returns Action-consequence pairs
*/
function deriveConsequencesFromVoting(
records: readonly VotingRecord[],
anomalies: readonly VotingAnomaly[]
): ActionConsequence[] {
const consequences: ActionConsequence[] = [];
for (const record of records.slice(0, 3)) {
consequences.push({
action: `Vote on "${record.title}"`,
consequence: `Result: ${record.result} (${record.votes.for}+ / ${record.votes.against}− / ${record.votes.abstain} abstain)`,
severity: record.votes.for > record.votes.against * 2 ? 'high' : 'medium',
});
}
for (const anomaly of anomalies.slice(0, 2)) {
consequences.push({
action: `${anomaly.type} detected`,
consequence: anomaly.description,
severity: anomaly.severity?.toLowerCase() === 'high' ? 'high' : 'medium',
});
}
return consequences;
}
/**
* Derive political mistakes from anomalies — defections signal miscalculations.
*
* @param anomalies - Detected voting anomalies
* @returns Political mistake assessments
*/
function deriveMistakesFromAnomalies(anomalies: readonly VotingAnomaly[]): PoliticalMistake[] {
return anomalies
.filter((a) => a.type?.toLowerCase().includes('defect') || a.severity?.toUpperCase() === 'HIGH')
.slice(0, 3)
.map((a) => ({
actor: 'Political group leadership',
description: `${a.type}: ${a.description}`,
alternative:
'Stronger whip coordination or earlier compromise negotiation could have maintained party discipline',
}));
}
// ─── Strategy-specific builders ──────────────────────────────────────────────
/**
* Build deep analysis for voting-based articles (motions, weekly/monthly review).
*
* @param dateFrom - Period start date
* @param dateTo - Period end date
* @param records - Voting records
* @param patterns - Voting patterns
* @param anomalies - Anomalies detected
* @param questions - Parliamentary questions
* @returns Deep analysis object
*/
export function buildVotingAnalysis(
dateFrom: string,
dateTo: string,
records: readonly VotingRecord[],
patterns: readonly VotingPattern[],
anomalies: readonly VotingAnomaly[],
questions: readonly MotionsQuestion[]
): DeepAnalysis {
const adoptedCount = records.filter((r) => r.result?.toLowerCase().includes('adopt')).length;
const rejectedCount = records.filter((r) => r.result?.toLowerCase().includes('reject')).length;
const topTopics = records.slice(0, 3).map((r) => r.title);
return {
what: `${records.length} votes recorded between ${dateFrom} and ${dateTo}: ${adoptedCount} adopted, ${rejectedCount} rejected. ${anomalies.length} voting anomalies detected across ${patterns.length} political groups. ${questions.length} parliamentary questions filed.`,
who: [
...patterns.map(
(p) =>
`${p.group} — cohesion: ${(p.cohesion * 100).toFixed(0)}%, participation: ${(p.participation * 100).toFixed(0)}%`
),
...questions.slice(0, 3).map((q) => `${q.author} — question on "${q.topic}"`),
],
when: [
`Period: ${dateFrom} to ${dateTo}`,
...records.slice(0, 3).map((r) => `${r.date}: Vote on "${r.title}" — ${r.result}`),
],
why:
patterns.length > 0
? `Voting behaviour reveals the balance of power: groups with high cohesion (${patterns.filter((p) => p.cohesion > 0.8).length} groups above 80%) can form blocking minorities or drive legislation. Anomalies signal shifting alliances and emerging fault lines that may reshape future coalition dynamics.`
: 'Voting patterns in this period reflect ongoing legislative negotiations and inter-institutional bargaining positions.',
stakeholderOutcomes: deriveStakeholderOutcomesFromVoting(records, patterns),
impactAssessment: {
political: `${adoptedCount} adopted texts will shape EU policy. ${anomalies.length} anomalies suggest internal disagreements that may affect future negotiations.`,
economic:
topTopics.length > 0
? `Legislation on ${topTopics.join(', ')} may affect regulatory environments, compliance costs, and market conditions across member states.`
: 'The legislative outcomes in this period carry potential economic implications for EU businesses and citizens.',
social: `Parliamentary questions on ${
questions
.slice(0, 2)
.map((q) => q.topic)
.join(' and ') || 'key policy areas'
} highlight citizen concerns that MEPs are bringing to the legislative agenda.`,
legal: `${adoptedCount} adopted texts enter the EU legal framework. Rejected proposals (${rejectedCount}) may return in amended form, creating legal uncertainty in affected policy areas.`,
geopolitical:
'Voting patterns reflect evolving EU positions on international affairs, trade relationships, and global governance commitments.',
},
actionConsequences: deriveConsequencesFromVoting(records, anomalies),
mistakes: deriveMistakesFromAnomalies(anomalies),
outlook:
anomalies.length > 0
? `Watch for coalition realignment: ${anomalies.length} anomalies detected. Groups with declining cohesion may seek new alliance partners. Upcoming committee votes will test whether these shifts are temporary or structural.`
: 'The legislative trajectory suggests continued consensus-building with potential pressure points in the weeks ahead.',
};
}
/**
* Build deep analysis for week-ahead/month-ahead articles.
*
* @param weekData - Aggregated week/month data
* @param dateRange - Date range for the preview period
* @param label - "week" or "month"
* @returns Deep analysis object
*/
export function buildProspectiveAnalysis(
weekData: WeekAheadData,
dateRange: DateRange,
label: string
): DeepAnalysis {
const eventCount = weekData.events.length;
const committeeCount = weekData.committees.length;
const docCount = weekData.documents.length;
const pipelineCount = weekData.pipeline.length;
const questionCount = weekData.questions.length;
const bottleneckProcedures = weekData.pipeline.filter((p) => p.bottleneck === true);
return {
what: `European Parliament ${label} ahead (${dateRange.start} to ${dateRange.end}): ${eventCount} plenary events, ${committeeCount} committee meetings, ${docCount} legislative documents, ${pipelineCount} pipeline procedures, ${questionCount} parliamentary questions scheduled.`,
who: [
...weekData.events.slice(0, 3).map((e) => `${e.type}: ${e.title}`),
...weekData.committees
.slice(0, 3)
.map((c) => `${c.committeeName ?? c.committee} — ${c.agenda?.length ?? 0} agenda items`),
],
when: [
`Period: ${dateRange.start} to ${dateRange.end}`,
...weekData.events.slice(0, 4).map((e) => `${e.date}: ${e.title}`),
],
why:
bottleneckProcedures.length > 0
? `${bottleneckProcedures.length} legislative procedures face bottleneck risks. These delays affect the EU's ability to respond to pressing policy challenges and may create downstream scheduling conflicts.`
: `With ${eventCount} events and ${pipelineCount} active procedures, this ${label} represents a significant workload. Scheduling density increases the risk of compressed debate time and last-minute amendments.`,
stakeholderOutcomes: [
...(bottleneckProcedures.length > 0
? [
{
actor: 'Legislative pipeline',
outcome: 'loser' as const,
reason: `${bottleneckProcedures.length} procedures bottlenecked — delays impact legislative throughput`,
},
]
: []),
...(weekData.committees.length > 3
? [
{
actor: 'Committee system',
outcome: 'neutral' as const,
reason: `${committeeCount} committees active — heavy workload demands efficient agenda management`,
},
]
: []),
],
impactAssessment: {
political: `${eventCount} plenary events will test political group discipline and coalition stability. Watch for amendment battles in key legislative files.`,
economic:
docCount > 0
? `${docCount} legislative documents under consideration may reshape market regulations, trade policies, or fiscal rules.`
: 'No major economic legislation currently flagged, though committee discussions may surface new regulatory proposals.',
social:
questionCount > 0
? `${questionCount} parliamentary questions signal MEP engagement with citizen concerns on policy implementation and accountability.`
: 'Social impact depends on the outcomes of plenary debates and committee decisions.',
legal:
pipelineCount > 0
? `${pipelineCount} pipeline procedures advancing through legislative stages — each vote creates binding legal obligations for member states.`
: 'The legal landscape awaits legislative outcomes from scheduled proceedings.',
geopolitical:
'External affairs debates and foreign policy questions may signal evolving EU positioning on global matters.',
},
actionConsequences: [
...bottleneckProcedures.slice(0, 2).map((p) => ({
action: `"${p.title}" in ${p.stage ?? 'committee'} stage`,
consequence: 'Bottleneck risk may cause delay or force procedural shortcuts',
severity: 'high' as const,
})),
...weekData.events.slice(0, 2).map((e) => ({
action: `${e.type} on "${e.title}"`,
consequence: e.description || 'Outcome will shape legislative direction',
severity: 'medium' as const,
})),
],
mistakes: bottleneckProcedures.slice(0, 2).map((p) => ({
actor: 'Legislative coordinators',
description: `"${p.title}" has reached bottleneck status at ${p.stage ?? 'committee'} stage`,
alternative: 'Earlier trilogue engagement or simplified procedure could have prevented delay',
})),
outlook: `The coming ${label} will test Parliament's capacity to manage ${eventCount} events and ${pipelineCount} active files simultaneously. Key decisions on ${weekData.events[0]?.title ?? 'pending matters'} may set the tone for the legislative session.`,
};
}
/**
* Build deep analysis for breaking news articles.
*
* @param date - Publication date
* @param feedData - EP feed data
* @param anomalyRaw - Raw anomaly text
* @param coalitionRaw - Raw coalition text
* @returns Deep analysis object
*/
export function buildBreakingAnalysis(
date: string,
feedData: BreakingNewsFeedData | undefined,
anomalyRaw: string,
coalitionRaw: string
): DeepAnalysis {
const adoptedCount = feedData?.adoptedTexts.length ?? 0;
const eventCount = feedData?.events.length ?? 0;
const procCount = feedData?.procedures.length ?? 0;
const mepCount = feedData?.mepUpdates.length ?? 0;
return {
what: `Breaking developments on ${date}: ${adoptedCount} newly adopted texts, ${eventCount} events, ${procCount} procedure updates, ${mepCount} MEP changes.`,
who: [
...(feedData?.adoptedTexts
.slice(0, 3)
.map((t) => `Adopted: ${t.title}${t.date ? ` (${t.date})` : ''}`) ?? []),
...(feedData?.mepUpdates
.slice(0, 2)
.map((m) => `MEP: ${m.name}${m.date ? ` (${m.date})` : ''}`) ?? []),
],
when: [
`Date: ${date}`,
...(feedData?.events.slice(0, 3).map((e) => `${e.title}${e.date ? ` (${e.date})` : ''}`) ??
[]),
],
why: anomalyRaw
? 'Voting anomalies and coalition shifts signal realignment of political forces within Parliament. These developments may alter the legislative calculus for pending files.'
: 'Current events reflect the ongoing pace of legislative activity. Feed data provides real-time visibility into parliamentary proceedings.',
stakeholderOutcomes: [
...(adoptedCount > 0
? [
{
actor: 'Legislative majority',
outcome: 'winner' as const,
reason: `${adoptedCount} texts adopted — the governing coalition successfully advanced its agenda`,
},
]
: []),
...(coalitionRaw
? [
{
actor: 'Opposition groups',
outcome: 'neutral' as const,
reason: 'Coalition dynamics in flux — opposition groups may find new leverage points',
},
]
: []),
],
impactAssessment: {
political: anomalyRaw
? 'Voting anomalies detected suggest shifting alliances that could reshape committee compositions and rapporteur assignments.'
: `${adoptedCount} adopted texts reflect the current balance of political forces.`,
economic: `New legislation may affect regulatory compliance, market conditions, and fiscal planning for EU businesses.`,
social: 'Citizens are directly affected by adopted texts and legislative procedure outcomes.',
legal: `${adoptedCount} adopted texts create new legal obligations. Procedure updates may signal changes to pending legislation.`,
geopolitical: coalitionRaw
? 'Coalition dynamics may influence EU external policy positions and international negotiation strategies.'
: 'Legislative outcomes carry implications for EU international commitments and trade negotiations.',
},
actionConsequences: [
...(feedData?.adoptedTexts.slice(0, 2).map((t) => ({
action: `Adoption of "${t.title}"${t.date ? ` (${t.date})` : ''}`,
consequence: 'New legal obligations for member states; implementation deadlines begin',
severity: 'high' as const,
})) ?? []),
...(feedData?.procedures.slice(0, 2).map((p) => ({
action: `Procedure update: "${p.title}"${p.date ? ` (${p.date})` : ''}`,
consequence: 'Legislative trajectory altered; stakeholders must adjust positions',
severity: 'medium' as const,
})) ?? []),
],
mistakes: anomalyRaw
? [
{
actor: 'Political group whips',
description:
'Failed to maintain voting discipline — anomalies detected in party-line votes',
alternative:
'Pre-vote consultations and compromise amendments could have preserved cohesion',
},
]
: [],
outlook: `Developments on ${date} signal ${adoptedCount > 0 ? 'an active legislative phase' : 'a transitional period'}. Watch for downstream effects on pending committee files and upcoming plenary sessions.`,
};
}
/**
* Classify pipeline health status.
*
* @param score - Health score between 0 and 1
* @returns Human-readable health label
*/
function pipelineHealthLabel(score: number): string {
if (score > 0.7) return 'strong';
if (score > 0.4) return 'moderate';
return 'weak';
}
/**
* Build the "why" explanation for propositions based on pipeline health.
*
* @param healthScore - 0-1 score
* @param throughput - Throughput rate
* @returns Explanation string
*/
function buildPropositionsWhy(healthScore: number, throughput: number): string {
const pct = (healthScore * 100).toFixed(0);
if (healthScore < 0.5) {
return `Pipeline health at ${pct}% signals legislative congestion. Low throughput (${throughput}) suggests inter-institutional negotiations are stalling, with knock-on effects for the legislative cycle.`;
}
const quality = healthScore > 0.7 ? 'healthy' : 'moderate';
return `Pipeline health at ${pct}% with throughput ${throughput} indicates ${quality} legislative progress. The co-decision process is functioning within normal parameters.`;
}
/**
* Build deep analysis for propositions articles.
*
* @param proposalsHtml - Proposals HTML (used to detect content presence)
* @param pipelineData - Pipeline metrics
* @param date - Publication date
* @returns Deep analysis object
*/
export function buildPropositionsAnalysis(
proposalsHtml: string,
pipelineData: PipelineData | null,
date: string
): DeepAnalysis {
const hasProposals = proposalsHtml.length > 0;
const healthScore = pipelineData?.healthScore ?? 0;
const throughput = pipelineData?.throughput ?? 0;
const pct = (healthScore * 100).toFixed(0);
return {
what: `Legislative pipeline assessment as of ${date}: Health score ${pct}%, throughput rate ${throughput}. ${hasProposals ? 'Active proposals under consideration.' : 'No new proposals detected in this period.'}`,
who: [
'European Commission (proposal originator)',
'Rapporteurs (responsible for steering through committee)',
'Shadow rapporteurs (political group negotiators)',
'Council of the EU (co-legislator)',
],
when: [`Assessment date: ${date}`, 'Pipeline health reflects cumulative legislative progress'],
why: buildPropositionsWhy(healthScore, throughput),
stakeholderOutcomes: [
...(healthScore > 0.7
? [
{
actor: 'Parliament presidency',
outcome: 'winner' as const,
reason: `High pipeline health (${pct}%) demonstrates effective legislative management`,
},
]
: [
{
actor: 'Pending legislation sponsors',
outcome: 'loser' as const,
reason: `Low pipeline health (${pct}%) means delays and potential session carry-overs`,
},
]),
],
impactAssessment: {
political: `Legislative throughput affects each political group's ability to deliver on manifesto commitments. ${healthScore < 0.5 ? 'Current congestion benefits status-quo defenders.' : 'Current pace favours reform-oriented groups.'}`,
economic:
'Pending legislation on digital markets, sustainability reporting, and fiscal governance carries significant economic implications for EU businesses.',
social:
'Citizens await legislative outcomes on healthcare, education, and social protection proposals currently in the pipeline.',
legal: `${throughput} procedures at various stages create a complex legal landscape. Overlapping implementation timelines may strain member state transposition capacity.`,
geopolitical:
'Trade, foreign aid, and sanctions-related proposals in the pipeline affect EU positioning in international negotiations.',
},
actionConsequences: [
{
action: `Pipeline health at ${pct}%`,
consequence:
healthScore < 0.5
? 'Risk of legislative session overrun; may force prioritisation and file abandonment'
: 'Sustainable pace; Parliament can accommodate new files without delay',
severity: healthScore < 0.3 ? 'critical' : healthScore < 0.5 ? 'high' : 'medium',
},
{
action: `Throughput rate at ${throughput}`,
consequence:
throughput < 5
? 'Slow processing reduces legislative output and postpones policy implementation'
: 'Healthy throughput enables timely delivery of policy commitments',
severity: throughput < 5 ? 'high' : 'low',
},
],
mistakes:
healthScore < 0.5
? [
{
actor: 'Conference of Presidents',
description: `Pipeline health dropped to ${pct}% — legislative agenda may be overloaded`,
alternative:
'Prioritise flagship files and defer low-priority proposals to maintain pipeline flow',
},
]
: [],
outlook: `The legislative pipeline's ${pipelineHealthLabel(healthScore)} health will determine whether current proposals reach plenary before session breaks. Key trilogues and committee votes in the coming weeks will be decisive.`,
};
}
/**
* Build deep analysis for committee reports articles.
*
* @param committees - Committee data list
* @param date - Publication date
* @returns Deep analysis object
*/
export function buildCommitteeAnalysis(
committees: readonly CommitteeData[],
date: string
): DeepAnalysis {
const totalDocs = committees.reduce((sum, c) => sum + c.documents.length, 0);
const activeCommittees = committees.filter((c) => c.documents.length > 0);
return {
what: `Committee activity report as of ${date}: ${committees.length} committees monitored, ${totalDocs} documents processed, ${activeCommittees.length} committees with recent activity.`,
who: committees.map(
(c) => `${c.name} (${c.abbreviation}) — Chair: ${c.chair}, ${c.members} members`
),
when: [
`Reporting date: ${date}`,
...committees
.slice(0, 3)
.flatMap((c) =>
c.documents
.slice(0, 1)
.map((d) => `${c.abbreviation}: ${d.title}${d.date ? ` (${d.date})` : ''}`)
),
],
why: `Committees are the legislative engine of the European Parliament — ${((activeCommittees.length / Math.max(committees.length, 1)) * 100).toFixed(0)}% active rate signals ${activeCommittees.length >= committees.length * 0.7 ? 'robust' : 'moderate'} legislative productivity. Committee outputs directly shape the texts that reach plenary votes.`,
stakeholderOutcomes: committees.slice(0, 4).map((c) => ({
actor: `${c.name} (${c.abbreviation})`,
outcome: (c.documents.length > 2
? 'winner'
: c.documents.length > 0
? 'neutral'
: 'loser') as 'winner' | 'loser' | 'neutral',
reason:
c.documents.length > 2
? `${c.documents.length} documents — highly productive period`
: c.documents.length > 0
? `${c.documents.length} document(s) — moderate activity`
: 'No recent documents — potential productivity concern',
})),
impactAssessment: {
political: `Committee chairs wield significant agenda-setting power. Active committees (${activeCommittees.length}/${committees.length}) are shaping the legislative pipeline for the current session.`,
economic:
'Committee outputs on economic affairs, industry, and trade directly affect EU regulatory environments and business competitiveness.',
social:
"Social affairs, employment, and civil liberties committees produce legislation that directly impacts citizens' daily lives.",
legal: `${totalDocs} documents in various stages of committee consideration will eventually create or modify EU law.`,
geopolitical:
'Foreign affairs and international trade committee activities signal evolving EU diplomatic and trade priorities.',
},
actionConsequences: activeCommittees.slice(0, 3).map((c) => ({
action: `${c.abbreviation} processed ${c.documents.length} document(s)`,
consequence: `Legislative proposals advance to next stage; affected stakeholders should prepare for implementation`,
severity: (c.documents.length > 3 ? 'high' : 'medium') as 'high' | 'medium',
})),
mistakes: committees
.filter((c) => c.documents.length === 0)
.slice(0, 2)
.map((c) => ({
actor: `${c.name} (${c.abbreviation})`,
description: 'No recent documents produced — legislative backlog may be developing',
alternative: 'Convene additional sessions or reassign resources to clear pending files',
})),
outlook: `With ${activeCommittees.length} of ${committees.length} committees actively producing documents, the ${activeCommittees.length >= committees.length * 0.7 ? 'current pace supports a productive plenary calendar' : 'legislative pipeline may face bottlenecks if committee output does not increase'}.`,
};
}
|